Road Less Traveled By
So, today we went on a hike to try and find the boundaries of our watershed as well as scope out potential sites we might take litter samples from. Thing is, there's a little tributary we didn't check out today. Now, this might be fine because we know it's there, and that's great. HOWEVER, the waypoint labeled "Canyon" on the points Bill took was taken in an area where we were over our little stream. This isn't a bad thing, but it means that, for the time being anyway, our stream has another tributary we didn't know about. This expands and changes our watershed a little, which is fine. The thing is that now we don't know if the tributary originally stated on the maps we have is actually there. I'm proposing that tomorrow when we take our samples we check out that last branch of stream. Bill has said that there is a path that follows that area and it's totally possible for us to check that out. I feel it's necessary to cover this ground since the land is accessible and there's no point in projecting our watershed out that far if the stream doesn't exist there to begin with. Please excuse any misspellings.
